通过C.L.A.P.方法带来积极的变化
今天,丝络谈™团队又迈出了重要的一步(即:推出CONNECT.SINOTALKS.COM),以履行我们的使命。我们欢迎快速增长的丝络谈™社区(其成员包括来自80个不同国家的近8000名读者)的参与,让我们的共同努力可以产生更多成果!Read more
今天,丝络谈™团队又迈出了重要的一步(即:推出CONNECT.SINOTALKS.COM),以履行我们的使命。我们欢迎快速增长的丝络谈™社区(其成员包括来自80个不同国家的近8000名读者)的参与,让我们的共同努力可以产生更多成果!Read more
Today, the SINOTALKS.COM team is taking another important step (i.e., the launch of CONNECT.SINOTALKS.COM) to carry out our mission. We welcome the participation of the rapidly-growing SINOTALKS.COM community (nearly 8,000 readers from 80 different countries) so that our joint efforts can produce more results! Read more
Image: Bushko Oleksandr/Shutterstock.com
美国联邦最高法院最近关于堕胎和枪支管制问题的裁决引起了全世界的关注。有趣的是,在地球的另一端,中国国家立法机构关于地方性法规与国家宪法不符的决定(从而引发了该地方性法规的修改)几乎没有引起人们的注意。这决定是关于什么的?它是如何作出的?这样一个说明中国立法的宪法审查的典型事例,如何才能更好地被人认识并产生更积极的影响?Read more
Image: Bushko Oleksandr/Shutterstock.com
Recent rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court on issues concerning abortion and firearm regulation have drawn worldwide attention. Interestingly, on the other side of the globe, a decision by China’s national legislature that a local regulation was inconsistent with the country’s constitution (thereby triggering an amendment to the local regulation) has gone almost unnoticed. What was the decision about? How was it made? How can such an exemplary instance illustrating the constitutional review of Chinese legislation be better known and used to produce more positive impact? Read more
The material presented on this website is for general reference only.
SINOTALKS® LLC disclaims all liability for any inaccuracy, error, or incompleteness in such material.
本网站提供的材料仅供一般参考。
丝络谈有限公司不对此类材料中的任何不准确、错误或不完整内容承担任何责任。
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
© 2025 SINOTALKS® LLC | © 2025年 丝络谈有限公司