SINOTALKS.COM

Image: Peter Griffin, Classroom
(Publicdomainpictures.net)

President XI Jinping recently issued instructions on the “high-quality development of philosophy and social sciences” to, according to China’s state-run news agency, “break the hegemony of Western discourse” and enhance China’s “cultural soft power”. President Xi’s instructions were rooted in a speech delivered ten years ago, which led to the recent publication of a handbook outlining the “autonomous systems of knowledge” of Chinese legal studies. Featuring how China’s “original theories” explain topics such as national security and human rights, this handbook will likely serve as an example when other “philosophy and social sciences” disciplines in China explore their ways to set up “autonomous systems of knowledge”. These developments, together with China’s growing population of foreign students, suggest that the country’s cultural soft power could grow rapidly and reshape geopolitics.

Image: Alix Lee, East District Vista
(Publicdomainpictures.net)

A recent survey conducted in Taiwan has sparked concerns because the results seem to suggest that a significant percentage of Taiwan people would “accept” “One Country, Two Systems”—the principle that China relied on to resume its sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao in 1997 and 1999, respectively—in order to avoid potential conflict with China. A closer look at the survey question reveals its lack of clarity. Yet a bigger problem is that it is based on an assumption: should “peaceful reunification” with China occur, Taiwan’s relationship with mainland China would be “much like the relationships currently shared by Hong Kong, Macao, and mainland China”. Various sources, including XI Jinping’s remarks, suggest that the Taiwan model would be quite different from the models used in Hong Kong and Macao.

Image: Mohamed Mahmoud Hassan, Installment, Car, Bank, Percentage
(Publicomainpictures.net)

Judicial protection of intellectual property (“IP”) rights in China has been perceived to be limited because, among other problems, the amounts of damages awarded by Chinese courts in IP infringement cases have historically been small. However, this state of affairs may be changing, as China’s Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) rendered a landmark judgment in a case involving large-scale infringement of trade secrets, allowing the victims to receive an amount equivalent to almost USD 90 million as compensation. As analyzed by Nathan Harpainter and David Zhao, Co-Managing Editors of SINOTALKS®, the innovative approach taken by the SPC to calculate the damages in the landmark case is essentially based on the concept of “unjust enrichment”. The steps followed by the SPC to do the calculation are helpful but inadequate. To help China develop its jurisprudence in this important area, the two co-authors discuss related U.S. experiences.

Image: Petr Kratochvil, American Flag And City Buildings (Publicdomainpictures.net)

On March 6, 2025, Dr. Mei Gechlik, Founder & CEO of SINOTALKS^® gave a talk about China’s Guiding Cases and related topics to a group of attorneys at the U.S. Department of Commerce to deepen their understanding of China’s court system and latest developments.