-
China’s Courts Give NEW Guidelines on Capital Markets Some Teeth
中国法院使新的资本市场指引“长牙带刺”
-
China’s Policy for Central Asia:
Lessons from Southeast Asia & More中国的中亚政策:东南亚的经验教训及其他考量
-
China’s Top Court Frees “Several” Birds with One Key
中国最高法院一石“几”鸟之举
-
Dr. Mei Gechlik Included in Marquis Who’s Who®
熊美英博士入选Marquis名人录®
-
TikTok: National Security, Protection of Minors, or Other Concerns?
抖音:国家安全、未成年人保护,还是其他担忧?
-
AI & Zambia Put Biden’s “No-Conflict Competition” with China to the Test
人工智能和赞比亚使拜登与中国“无冲突地竞争”的
计划经受考验 -
China’s NEW Law on Foreign State Immunity and
Related U.S. Experiences中国崭新的外国国家豁免法及美国的相关经验
-
The United States Approach to Foreign Sovereign Immunity
美国对外国主权豁免的做法
-
A Colloquium at Stanford Law School
斯坦福法学院的座谈会
-
Priorities of the BRICS Under Russia’s Leadership
俄罗斯领导下的金砖国家的优先事项
Featured Partners
Featured Articles
Guiding Case No. 196 (“GC196”) holds that, under Chinese law, an agreement to arbitrate is independently enforceable, even if the agreement was intended to be part of a larger contract that never fully formed. Through a comparison of GC196 with U.S. law, Tyler Atkinson explains why GC196 shows that Chinese law is arguably more favorable to arbitration than the law of the United States, a jurisdiction that, itself, strongly favors arbitration. He also shares practical insights about what companies affected by GC196 should do to avoid the risk of being forced into arbitration.
The United States Approach to Foreign Sovereign Immunity
Written by Judge John M. Walker Jr., a senior judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, this article provides an overview of the U.S. approach to foreign sovereign immunity. First, it traces the doctrine’s origins in early American jurisprudence and recounts the development of the doctrine and its eventual codification in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) of 1976. The article then summarizes relevant provisions and certain judicial interpretations of the FSIA.
China’s Top Court Frees “Several” Birds with One Key
A little-known Q&A tool used within China’s court system since 2023 was recently brought to the spotlight. With its promising performance, the tool allows China’s highest court to “free several birds with one key”. The far-reaching impact of the tool also lays a solid foundation for China to develop AI-assisted adjudication.
-
Recognition & Special Mentions
Honored Listee
(Marquis Who’s Who®) -
Recognition & Special Mentions
Bridging Information Gaps Sees Benefits
(China Daily) -
Recognition & Special Mentions
Most Trusted Law & Policy Information Provider
(The Enterprise World) -
Recognition & Special Mentions
20 Most Inspiring Women Leaders 2022
(The Women Leaders) -
SINOTALKS®In Brief
demystifies China law, policy, and business to help readers craft evidence-based strategies
-
SinoExpress™
analyzes significant international developments pertaining to China and/or its law and policy
-
SinoForum&Foresight™
features precise and concise articles contributed by legal professionals and other experts
-
SinoNews&Events™
shares news and events related to the SINOTALKS® team
-
SinoInsights™
presents in-depth and insightful analyses of China-related topics
-
SinoRules&Cases™
provides, with explanatory notes, high-quality English translations of select Chinese rules and cases
-
Consultation
-
Training
-
Speaking Engagements
SINOTALKS® In Brief
中国最高法院一石“几”鸟之举
SinoExpress™
俄罗斯领导下的金砖国家的优先事项
台湾第三政党与意想不到的中美合作
SinoForum&Foresight™
美国对外国主权豁免的做法
全球人权治理的中国方案
中国人工智能产业
SinoNews&Events™
SinoInsights™
SinoRules&Cases™
Services
Get Involved
Sponsor/Donate | 赞助/捐赠
Become SINOTALKS® Partners | 成为丝络谈™合作伙伴