Images: Andrea Stöckel, Vintage Art Music Cats;
Karen Arnold, Do Not Copy Stamp (Publicdomainpictures.net)
最近，北京一所上诉法院在长达5年的官司中，判决一位比利时艺术家胜诉，维持了北京知识产权法院此前的判决，认定该艺术家画作多年被中国艺术家抄袭。取得胜利的关键一步是比利时艺术家成功争取到将案件保留于北京知识产权法院审判。世界各地所有寻求保护其著作权的艺术家都应该了解该法院在此案中采取的积极行动和判决留下的不清晰之处，以及为什么这些艺术家应该利用像小红书这样的平台来避免遭遇比利时艺术家所经历的煎熬。Read more
Images: Andrea Stöckel, Vintage Art Music Cats;
Karen Arnold, Do Not Copy Stamp (Publicdomainpictures.net)
An appellate court in Beijing just delivered a victory to a Belgian artist in a five-year-long legal battle, upholding an earlier ruling of the Beijing Intellectual Property Court that his paintings have been plagiarized for years by a Chinese artist. A key step towards this victory was the Belgian artist’s success in keeping the case in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. Artists around the world seeking to protect their copyrights should understand both the positive actions this court took in this case and the confusion that remains as a result of the court’s decision, as well as why they should leverage platforms such as Rednote to avoid ordeals like the one experienced by the Belgian artist.Read more
Image: Mohamed Mahmoud Hassan, Big Data Artificial Intelligence, Publicdomainpictures.net
On July 18, 2022, Dr. Mei Gechlik was interviewed by China Daily to discuss China’s intellectual property policy.Read more
Image: Pixels Hunter/Shutterstock.com
Amid foreign businesses’ growing concerns about COVID restrictions, China’s five-year intellectual property plan may help instill confidence. If implemented well, the plan will help China establish a strong intellectual property protection mechanism that will facilitate the country’s post-COVID economic recovery. How can the plan be implemented well?Read more
Image: Wright Studio/Lightspring/Shutterstock.com
Justice delayed is justice denied. The prompt delivery of judgments is particularly important in cases involving infringement of intellectual property rights, where holders of these rights need to minimize their losses by stopping the infringement swiftly. China does offer a solution. How does it work? Read more
Image: mohamed mahmoud hassan, Lightbulb, Idea, Innovation, Publicdomainpictures.net
How can the development of China’s Case Guidance System promote the country’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights, helping achieve the goals set forth in the Plan for the Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in People’s Courts (2021-2025)?Read more
Image: Anastasia Amstutz, Windshield Rain, Publicdomainpictures.net
In December 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China released Guiding Case No. 115. Four months later, in April 2020, the second-instance judgment upon which this Guiding Case is based was selected by the Supreme People’s Court as one of the “Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases of Chinese Courts in 2019”. Why is this case so important? It is all related to the concepts of “act preservation” and “functional features” of inventions.Read more
Left image: Michal Sanca/Shutterstock.com
Middle image: Sazhnieva Oksana/Shutterstock.com
Right image: Artreef/Shutterstock.com
名人在中国应该怎么保护自己的名字？ 为什么阿里巴巴需要采取一些补救措施来避免当局进一步的监察？Read more
Left image: Michal Sanca/Shutterstock.com
Middle image: Sazhnieva Oksana/Shutterstock.com
Right image: Artreef/Shutterstock.com
What should celebrities do to protect their names in China? Why does Alibaba need to take some remedial measures to avoid further scrutiny from authorities?Read more
Image: Den Rise/Shutterstock.com
Apart from China’s Guiding Cases, legal practitioners, business executives, and other stakeholders must not forget about Typical Cases, another category of representative cases that the Supreme People’s Court of China can release to guide Chinese courts’ adjudication. What are Typical Cases? Why are they significant?Read more
Image: Heru Purwanto, Pomelo On The Tree, Publicdomainpictures.net
Guiding Case No. 160 addresses a fundamental issue: when rights to a new plant variety are granted, what falls within the scope of protection? According to China’s legislation, propagation materials of the plant for which variety rights have been granted are clearly protected. Yet, what are “propagation materials”? Unfortunately, no definition can be found in China’s legislation. Guiding Case No. 160 fills the legal gap by setting the criteria for such determination.Read more
Image: George Hodan, Agriculture, Publicdomainpictures.net
中国最高人民法院发布指导案例92号、100号和160号，明确该国立法和司法解释尚未解决的植物新品种权保护的基本问题。然而，本文分析指出，这三个指导性案例的指导原则已经被纳入最高人民法院最新的植物新品种司法解释。考虑到这一点，这些指导性案例是否基本上已经失去了重要性？熊美英博士解释了为什么答案是否定的并讨论了相关的含义。Read more
Image: George Hodan, Agriculture, Publicdomainpictures.net
The Supreme People’s Court of China released Guiding Case Nos. 92, 100, and 160 to clarify fundamental issues related to the protection of rights to new plant varieties that were left unanswered by the country’s legislation and judicial interpretations. Yet, have these three Guiding Cases essentially lost their significance, considering that their guiding principles, as analyzed in this article, have already been incorporated into the Supreme People’s Court’s latest judicial interpretation related to new plant varieties? Dr. Mei Gechlik explains why the answer is negative and discusses related implications. Read more
The material presented on this website is for general reference only.
SINOTALKS® LLC disclaims all liability for any inaccuracy, error, or incompleteness in such material.
本网站提供的材料仅供一般参考。
丝络谈有限公司不对此类材料中的任何不准确、错误或不完整内容承担任何责任。
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
© 2025 SINOTALKS® LLC | © 2025年 丝络谈有限公司
