On:
In: SINOTALKS® In Brief | 丝络谈™简讯

Image: Wright Studio/Lightspring/Shutterstock.com

Justice delayed is justice denied. The prompt delivery of judgments is particularly important in cases involving infringement of intellectual property rights, where holders of these rights need to minimize their losses by stopping the infringement swiftly. China does offer a solution. How does it work? Read more

On:
In: SinoRules&Cases™ | 丝络规则与案例™

Image: Anastasia Amstutz, Windshield Rain, Publicdomainpictures.net

2019年12月，中国最高人民法院发布了指导案例115号。四个月后，也就是2020年4月，该指导性案例所依据的二审判决被最高人民法院选定为“2019年中国法院10大知识产权案件”之一。为什么该案如此重要？这都与“行为保全”和发明的“功能性特征”的概念有关。Read more

On:
In: SinoRules&Cases™ | 丝络规则与案例™

Image: Anastasia Amstutz, Windshield Rain, Publicdomainpictures.net

In December 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China released Guiding Case No. 115. Four months later, in April 2020, the second-instance judgment upon which this Guiding Case is based was selected by the Supreme People’s Court as one of the “Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases of Chinese Courts in 2019”. Why is this case so important? It is all related to the concepts of “act preservation” and “functional features” of inventions.Read more